Why We Offer It
Many people arrive in therapy after already trying hard. They have learned coping skills, read the books, and understood a great deal about themselves, and still find the same pattern returning. The same relationship dynamic. The same freeze before a decision. The same harsh voice, despite their best efforts.
Psychodynamic therapy asks why. It treats those patterns as meaningful rather than as malfunctions, and it gets curious about their origins instead of only working around them. The goal is deeper insight into yourself and your story, which becomes the ground for a more self-compassionate and confident relationship with yourself and with the people in your life.
It is also one of the oldest roots of modern therapy. Many approaches we use, including attachment-based work and Internal Family Systems, share its central premise that early experience shapes the present.
What We Use Psychodynamic Therapy For
- Patterns that keep repeating, despite your best efforts to change them
- Feeling that symptom-focused therapy helped, but only partway
- Relationship dynamics that show up again and again with different people
- A harsh inner critic or limiting beliefs you cannot trace to a source
- Choices you keep making and do not fully understand
- Wanting to understand your story, not only manage how you feel
What This Work Generally Involves
Sessions are collaborative and curious. Your therapist meets you compassionately where you are, while staying curious enough to notice themes that connect past and present and to help untangle what does not yet make sense.
There is usually less structure than in skills-based work. You bring what is on your mind, and attention goes to what comes up, including feelings that are hard to name and moments in the therapy relationship itself. Insight tends to build gradually, across sessions rather than within one.
Where the Research Stands
Psychodynamic therapy has a more substantial evidence base than its reputation suggests, and a smaller one than cognitive behavioral therapy.
A 2010 review in American Psychologist by Jonathan Shedler examined eight meta-analyses of psychodynamic therapy. One included 1,431 patients with a range of concerns and found a large effect on overall symptoms (0.97), which grew to 1.51 when patients were re-evaluated nine or more months after therapy ended. That pattern of continued improvement after treatment is one of the more distinctive findings in this literature.
A 2017 meta-analysis in the American Journal of Psychiatry by Christiane Steinert and colleagues pooled 23 randomized trials with 2,751 patients, most comparing psychodynamic therapy with CBT, and concluded the two performed equivalently.
The honest caveats: critics of the 2017 analysis noted it combined very different conditions and outcome measures, so equivalence has not been shown for every concern. The study was also funded by a psychoanalytic professional society, though the authors report the sponsor was not involved. We offer psychodynamic therapy because the evidence is real and because of what we see in the room, not because every question about it is settled.