How We Work With Trauma
Trauma-informed is a phrase nearly every practice uses now, so it is worth saying what we mean by it.
We go at your pace. The most common way trauma therapy goes wrong is moving faster than a nervous system can tolerate. You do not have to tell the story to begin, and you never have to tell all of it. You get to decide what to explore and at what length or depth.
We work with the body, not only the narrative. Much of what trauma leaves behind sits below language, in tension, numbness, startle, and shutdown. Insight alone may not always reach it.
We treat your responses as intelligent. Hypervigilance, dissociation, people-pleasing, and going blank were adaptations. They worked. Understanding them as protective rather than pathological changes what is possible.
We pay attention to relationship. When harm happened in relationship, repair needed to happen there too. That means the therapeutic relationship itself can be part of the work too rather than just the setting for it.
What We Work With
- Complex trauma and post-traumatic stress
- Childhood abuse, neglect, and emotional deprivation
- Relational and attachment trauma
- Adoption, relinquishment, and early separation
- Grief, sudden loss, and traumatic bereavement
- Nervous system dysregulation: panic, shutdown, chronic hypervigilance
- Anxiety and depression with roots in trauma
The Approaches We Draw On
Trauma work here is integrative rather than a single protocol. Depending on what fits you, that may include Internal Family Systems, attachment-based work, Emotional Freedom Technique, somatic and mindfulness practices, a polyvagal-informed approach to pacing, and CBT or DBT skills where concrete tools help.
Where the Research Stands
The trauma field has genuinely well-supported treatments. Trauma-focused CBT, prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, and EMDR all have substantial randomized trial evidence and appear as recommended treatments in clinical guidelines internationally.
Some of the approaches we lean on, such as IFS and somatic therapies, have smaller and more emerging evidence bases, as we describe honestly on their own pages. What has stronger support is the broader set of principles: that pacing and perceived safety matter, that the therapeutic alliance predicts outcome, and that complex trauma generally requires longer and more relational work than single-incident trauma.
If a front-line trauma protocol is what you need, we will say so and help you find it.